19,291 research outputs found

    Precise photoproduction of the charged top-pions at the LHC with forward detector acceptances

    Get PDF
    We study the photoproduction of the charged top-pion predicted by the top triangle moose (TTMTTM) model (a deconstructed version of the topcolor-assisted technicolor TC2TC2 model) via the processes pppγpπt±t+Xpp\rightarrow p \gamma p \rightarrow \pi^\pm_t t +X at the 14 TeVTeV Large Hadron Collider (LHCLHC) including next-to-leading order (NLONLO) QCDQCD corrections. Our results show that the production cross sections and distributions are sensitive to the free parameters sinω\sin\omega and MπtM_{\pi_t}. Typical QCDQCD correction value is 7%11%7\% \sim 11\% and does not depend much on sinω\sin\omega as well as the forward detector acceptances.Comment: 21pages, 7figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1201.4364 by other author

    The focusing of electron flow in a bipolar Graphene ribbon with different chiralities

    Get PDF
    The focusing of electron flow in a symmetric p-n junction (PNJ) of graphene ribbon with different chiralities is studied. Considering the PNJ with the sharp interface, in a armchair ribbon, the electron flow emitting from (L,0)(-L,0) in n-region can always be focused perfectly at (L,0)(L,0) in p-region in the whole Dirac fermion regime, i.e. in whole regime E0<tE_0<t where E0E_0 is the distance between Dirac-point energy and Fermi energy and tt is the nearest hopping energy. For the bipolar ribbon with zigzag edge, however, the incoming electron flow in n-region is perfectly converged in p-region only in a very low energy regime with E0<0.05tE_0<0.05t. Moreover, for a smooth PNJ, electrons are backscattered near PNJ, which weakens the focusing effect. But the focusing pattern still remains the same as that of the sharp PNJ. In addition, quantum oscillation in charge density occurs due to the interference between forward and backward scattering. Finally, in the presence of weak perpendicular magnetic field, charge carriers are deflected in opposite directions in the p-region and n-region. As a result, the focusing effect is smeared. The lower energy E0E_0, the easier the focusing effect is destroyed. For the high energy E0E_0 (e.g. E0=0.9tE_0=0.9t), however, the focusing effect can still survive in a moderate magnetic field on order of one Tesla.Comment: 29 pages, 16 figure

    Symmetry and transport property of spin current induced spin-Hall effect

    Get PDF
    We study the spin current induced spin-Hall effect that a longitudinal spin dependent chemical potential qVs=x,y,zqV_{s=x,y,z} induces a transverse spin conductances GssG^{ss'}. A four terminal system with Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit interaction (SOI) in the scattering region is considered. By using Landauer-Bu¨\ddot uttiker formula with the aid of the Green function, various spin current induced spin-Hall conductances GssG^{ss'} are calculated. With the charge chemical potential qVcqV_c or spin chemical potential qVs=x,y,zqV_{s=x,y,z}, there are 16 elements for the transverse conductances Gpμν=Jp,μ/VνG^{\mu \nu}_p=J_{p,\mu}/V_{\nu} where μ,ν=x,y,z,c\mu,\nu=x,y,z,c. Due to the symmetry of our system these elements are not independent. For the system with C2C_2 symmetry half of elements are zero, when the center region only exists the Rashba SOI or Dresselhaus SOI. The numerical results show that of all the conductance elements, the spin current induced spin-Hall conductances GssG^{ss'} are usually much greater (about one or two orders of magnitude) than the spin Hall conductances GscG^{sc} and the reciprocal spin Hall conductances GcsG^{cs}. So the spin current induced spin-Hall effect is dominating in the present device.Comment: 7 pages, 6 figure
    corecore